A useful AI prompt for FiveM describes one task, the exact context and a way to check the answer. Use the templates below with your own non-sensitive information. Treat the output as a draft, especially when it contains code, commands or policy claims.
Explain an error
Use this after removing keys, webhooks and player identifiers from the excerpt:
Explain this error from my FiveM resource. Separate what the log proves from possible causes. Use the supplied framework version and official documentation. Suggest the smallest diagnostic step before proposing a fix. Do not invent exports, events or database tables.
Resource and version: …
Action that failed: …
Exact error and relevant code: …
Official documentation: …
Review a code change
Review this small FiveM diff against the supplied APIs. Check server-side authorization, invalid input, repeated events, persistence and per-frame work. For each finding, name the line and a reproducible failure case. Do not claim the code was tested.
Expected behaviour: …
Framework/resource versions: …
Diff and relevant contracts: …
Improve player instructions
Rewrite these joining instructions for a new player. Preserve the actual commands, links and requirements. Put the next action first, explain where to perform it and state what success looks like. Flag missing information instead of filling it in.
Current instructions: …
Audience and server language: …
Plan a roleplay event
Suggest three event outlines for this community using only the available locations, activities and staff. Give each an opening, a way for new players to participate and a clear ending. Respect the supplied rules and do not assume a script exists.
Available systems and staff: …
Community rules: …
Duration and audience: …
Check the output
Confirm every command or API against the installed resource and current primary documentation. Test code in a development environment with allowed and denied actions. Review player-facing instructions by following them with a new account.
Do not paste secrets, private player records or source code you cannot disclose. Ask a qualified reviewer to assess legal or security decisions; a confident generated answer is not evidence that the decision is correct.